Exploring the critical role of mineral resource governance in Europe's green transition and sustainable development
Take a moment and pull out your smartphone. This sleek device in your palm contains an astonishing geological treasure—roughly 30 different minerals sourced from mines across six continents. The cobalt in your battery likely came from the Democratic Republic of Congo, the lithium from Chile, the rare earth elements from China. This pocket-sized marvel represents a paradox of our modern world: the technologies driving us toward a sustainable future depend entirely on an industry with significant environmental and social impacts.
Lithium demand increase by 2050 6
Cobalt demand increase by 2050 6
Global CO₂ emissions from minerals industry 1
This is the complex reality of mineral resource governance—the framework of laws, regulations, and practices that determines how we extract, process, and use mineral wealth. As the European Union accelerates toward its Green Deal ambitions, it faces a formidable challenge: how to secure the minerals essential for clean energy technologies while ensuring their production doesn't undermine the very sustainability goals it hopes to achieve.
Mineral governance represents the fourth dimension of sustainability—joining economic, environmental, and social concerns as pillars of sustainable development 3 .
The scale of modern mineral production is almost incomprehensible. Since the mid-20th century, our material-intensive lifestyles have driven a formidable acceleration in extraction 1 . This comes with staggering environmental costs: the minerals and metals industry already contributes to 16% of global CO₂ emissions and generates approximately 50 billion tons of solid waste annually—25 times the estimated amount of urban waste produced worldwide 1 .
The governance challenges extend far beyond environmental concerns. Mineral production can be a source of social disruption and conflict, particularly when benefits flow disproportionately to corporations and political elites while local communities bear the environmental costs 3 .
Despite some progress in sustainability reporting, most end-users have no visibility into how the minerals in their products were sourced 1 .
Geopolitical tensions create vulnerabilities in supply chains for critical minerals essential for clean energy, digital technologies, and defense applications 2 .
The European Union finds itself in a particularly challenging position. As it charges toward climate neutrality by 2050 through its European Green Deal, it simultaneously faces a sobering dependency on imported minerals 6 .
Despite these challenges, Europe possesses unique advantages that could position it as a leader in sustainable mineral governance. The continent boasts a world-class innovation ecosystem centered around EIT Raw Materials, launched in 2015 and now the world's largest organized and funded mineral- and metal-related innovation network, linking over 120 partners from academia, industry, and research organizations 1 .
| Mineral | Projected EU Demand Increase by 2030 | Primary Applications | Key Supply Challenges |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lithium | 18 times current levels | Electric vehicle batteries, energy storage | Geographic concentration, water-intensive extraction |
| Cobalt | 5 times current levels | Battery electrodes, aerospace alloys | Political instability, artisanal mining concerns |
| Rare Earth Elements | Significant increases | Permanent magnets for wind turbines | China's dominance in processing |
| Copper | Steady increases | Electricity networks, electric vehicles | Declining ore grades, energy-intensive processing |
How can we systematically assess whether the extractive sector is making cosmetic adjustments or pursuing genuine transformation? This question inspired a fascinating 2025 European study that applied the Leverage Points Approach to mineral extraction practices across the continent 5 .
Adjusting parameters like mine efficiency or waste management protocols.
Redesigning feedback loops through better monitoring systems.
Addressing system goals, values, and paradigms—questioning extraction itself.
The findings revealed a striking imbalance in intervention approaches. The vast majority of practices (over 75%) addressed only shallow to intermediate leverage points, focusing on technical optimizations rather than systemic transformation 5 .
The research identified almost no practices that successfully addressed the deepest leverage points related to system intent, goals, and paradigms 5 .
If the experimental results reveal a transformation gap, what might bridge it? Circular economy principles offer one of the most promising pathways. By keeping materials in use through recycling, reuse, and remanufacturing, we can substantially reduce the need for primary extraction 3 .
Developing resource-efficient materials and eco-design of products
Implementing approaches where one industry's waste becomes another's resource
EU Action Plan on Critical Raw Materials and global frameworks
Perhaps the most crucial insight from recent research is that technical fixes alone are insufficient. Effective mineral governance requires integrating mineral policy with land-use planning, environmental protection, and social development 9 .
| Instrument Type | Examples | Implementation Challenges | Effectiveness Factors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regulatory | Mineral safeguarding in spatial plans | Regulatory complexity, enforcement capacity | Clear legal mandates, inter-agency coordination |
| Economic | Compensation mechanisms, fiscal incentives | Budget limitations, market distortions | Alignment with broader economic policies |
| Information-based | Mineral potential maps, sustainability reporting | Data quality, accessibility issues | Standardized methodologies, user-friendly formats |
| Voluntary | Corporate sustainability initiatives | Variable participation, greenwashing risks | Independent verification, consumer awareness |
A framework for assessing the transformative potential of interventions in complex systems 5 .
Methodologies for quantifying environmental impacts across the entire value chain.
Tracking the movement of minerals through economies to identify inefficiencies.
Using satellite imagery and GIS to monitor mining impacts and land use changes.
Examining how different policy instruments interact in real-world contexts 9 .
The challenge of mineral resource governance represents one of the defining sustainability puzzles of our century. As we've seen, the minerals and metals that enable our renewable energy systems, digital technologies, and modern infrastructure come with significant environmental and social baggage. The experimental evidence using the Leverage Points Approach reveals that, despite some progress, the extractive sector remains far from the transformative changes needed to align fully with sustainability principles 5 .
For the European Union, the path forward requires balancing its climate ambitions with responsible sourcing, leveraging its innovation capacity while acknowledging its consumption patterns.
The promising news is that frameworks for improved governance are taking shape. From circular economy approaches to international cooperation mechanisms, we have the tools to transform mineral governance. What remains is the political will and societal commitment to implement them at scale.
The goal is not merely to extract resources more efficiently, but to cultivate a fundamentally different relationship with the mineral wealth that underpins our societies—one of stewardship rather than domination, regeneration rather than depletion.
References will be added here in the required format.