How Ex-Situ TEM Reveals Hidden Lives of Bimetallic Particles
Imagine dissecting a chemical reaction with surgical precisionânot in real time, but by examining molecular "crime scenes" after the fact. This is the power of ex-situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM), a technique allowing scientists to reconstruct complex material transformations atom by atom.
In sustainable chemistry, bimetallic nanoparticles like palladium-platinum (Pd@Pt) coreshell structures are workhorse catalysts for critical reactionsâfrom hydrogen fuel production to pollution control. Yet their true behavior during catalytic cycles like the reduction-oxidation-reduction (ROR) process remained elusive.
Ex-situ TEM provides forensic-level evidence of structural changes impossible to capture mid-reaction, revealing secrets that could unlock cleaner energy technologies 2 3 .
Bimetallic particles combine metals at the nanoscale to enhance catalytic performance through synergistic effects. Their structure-function relationships, however, are notoriously complex:
Mismatched atomic sizes (e.g., Pt coating Pd) compress surface atoms, altering reactivity.
Oxygen may target one metal (e.g., Pd) in a Pd@Pt particle, creating oxide domains that block active sites.
Repeated oxidation/reduction cycles cause atomic redistribution or particle sintering 3 .
While in-situ TEM observes reactions live, it struggles with:
Ex-situ TEM circumvents this by "freezing" particles after each ROR stage for high-resolution analysis .
Researchers analyzed 5-nm Pd@Pt particles subjected to three stages:
Activate metallic state
Induce controlled corrosion
Restore functionality
Particles were "captured" after each step for TEM analysis.
ROR Stage | Pd:Pt Ratio (Core) | Pd:Pt Ratio (Shell) | Oxide Thickness (nm) |
---|---|---|---|
Initial | 1:0.05 | 1:4.2 | 0.0 |
Post-Oxidation | 1:0.04 | 1:3.8 | 0.8 ± 0.2 |
Post-2nd Reduction | 1:0.06 | 1:4.1 | 0.1 ± 0.1 |
Cycle Number | Hâ Turnover Frequency (sâ»Â¹) | Lattice Strain (%) | Pt Surface Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 98 |
5 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 92 |
10 | 2.4 | 3.8 | 85 |
Item | Function | Innovation Purpose |
---|---|---|
MEMS-based TEM Holders | Apply heat/gas stimuli pre-analysis | Simulate real-world conditions pre-TEM "freezing" 3 |
Low-Voltage FIB (â¤500 eV) | Thin samples without Ga⺠implantation | Preserves crystallinity for atomic-scale EDS mapping 2 |
Cryo-Transfer Adapters | Shield samples from air during transfer | Prevents artifacts from unintended reactions |
EELS Fingerprinting | Detects O-K edge shifts at 532 eV | Quantifies oxide formation in sub-nm domains 2 |
Focused Ion Beam-SEM | Targets specific device regions post-electrical testing | Ensures analysis of "active" reaction zones 2 |
While in-situ TEM excels at capturing millisecond dynamics, ex-situ remains indispensable for:
Resolving sub-ångström lattice distortions during oxidation 2 .
Cross-validating TEM data with synchrotron XAS or AFM.
Studying electron-sensitive oxides (e.g., CeOâ) without decomposition.
Ex-situ TEM transforms static snapshots into dynamic narratives of material evolution. For bimetallic catalysts, it has exposed a paradoxical truth: structural imperfectionsâstrain, defects, and intermixingâare not flaws but features that boost performance.